HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY
Academic Year 2022/2023 - Teacher: EMANUELE GIUSEPPE COCOExpected Learning Outcomes
To this end, the course is divided into two sections: an 'institutional part' and a 'monographic part'.
The institutional part is devoted to the founding authors of modern philosophical thought, from Bruno to Kant. Some of the key points of reflection on man, Nature, the possibility of knowing the world and oneself, happiness and other aspects of life and relations with others will be addressed.
The monographic course (thematic in-depth studies) is dedicated to the relationship between the individual and society, with particular reference to two aspects: 1. philosophy as a tool for analysis and intervention in the face of the current ecological crisis and the inconveniences it causes to the individual and the well-being of societies; 2. the tension between personal needs and the social context.
The first in-depth study is entitled "
The course aims to develop knowledge and understanding of authors, epochs, problems and theories. References to contemporary and life experiences will facilitate the development of an understanding applied to the social, personal and historical context. In addition to providing knowledge related to the characterising contents of the subject, the course aims at the development of some transversal competences with particular reference to autonomy of judgement, communication and teamwork skills, self-analysis and personal development. The latter objectives will be pursued through three main channels: 1. the general approach of the lectures aimed at showing, within the filigree of the topics covered, elements useful for developing the skills listed above; 2. classroom activities (active participation of students during the lectures and exposure on their part of some of the topics in the programme, shared discussion); 3. development of a specific part - within the monographic course - dedicated to knowledge of oneself and of others.
Course Structure
Required Prerequisites
Attendance of Lessons
Detailed Course Content
Textbook Information
- M. Mori, Storia della filosofia moderna, Laterza, 2019 [290 pages; also available in ebook format]
- E. Coco, La fine degli spiriti, Mimesis, 2022 [130 pages]
- E. Coco, Natura e illuminismo. Il viaggio formativo di Alessandro Malaspina, Olschki, 2022 [120 pages]
- H. Marcuse, Eros e civiltà, Einaudi, 2001 [230 pages; it is possible to use also the English edition]
Course Planning
Subjects | Text References | |
---|---|---|
1 | Institutional part. Giordano Bruno | Mori, cap. 2 + “Dispense - PDF 1” + Diapositive |
2 | Institutional part. Scientific thought in the 16th and 17th centuries: Copernicus, Brahe, Kepler, Galilei, Newton | Mori, cap. 4 + “Dispense - PDF 1” + Diapositive |
3 | Institutional part. Modern philosophy: Bacon, Descartes, Cartesianism and Jansenism, Hobbes, Pascal, Spinoza, Locke, Leibniz, Vico, Berkeley, Hume, the Enlightenment, Kant | Mori, capitoli da 5 a 16 + ''Dispense - PDF 1'' + Diapositive |
4 | Monographic part: 'Philosophy, environment and society'. | Book 2: E. Coco, La fine degli spiriti, Mimesis, 2022 [130 pp.] Book 3:Una trascinante natura. Illuminismo, scienza e giustizia sociale in Alessandro Malaspina, Olschki, 2022 [120 pp.] |
5 | Monographic part: 'Nature, personal development and happiness. Freud, Marcuse and the Reality Principle'. | Book 4: H. Marcuse, ''Eros and civilisation''. Study the following parts: Introduction, Chapters I to XI, Epilogue |
Learning Assessment
Learning Assessment Procedures
In the event that the lectures are not attended and the in itinere activities are not carried out, all the contents indicated in the Syllabus must be presented in the exam.
As a general guideline, the assessment criteria adopted are given below:
- Adequacy of expression and clarity of exposition
Ability to rework knowledge Ability to organise knowledge thematically and to make connections between different authors and/or problems, correctly arguing the reasons for any proposed connections Breadth of thematic awareness and lexical correctness Capacity for critical investigation Ability to make interdisciplinary connections Verification of learning may also be carried out electronically, should conditions require it.
Examples of frequently asked questions and / or exercises
In general, the candidate is asked to:
- set out the details of the philosophical system of a certain author (e.g. the philosophy of Leibniz);
- state their critical opinion of a certain philosophical system, giving reasons for their positions;
- draw a comparison between one author and another on a certain aspect of their philosophy (e.g. how two or more authors conceive of substance, morality, god, etc.)
- illustrate a certain historical period from a philosophical point of view (e.g. the Enlightenment)
- illustrate the salient points of a philosophical dispute in the course of time (e.g. rationalists vs. empiricists)
- illustrate the reciprocal influences between a certain philosophical current (and a specific author) and an area of human intellectual and cultural activity (e.g. influences of 17th-century science on the philosophical philosophy of the time and later)
- illustrate the contents of a philosophical work (e.g. Descartes' 'Discourse on Method' or Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason')
- illustrate the meaning of a philosophical term and its concrete flight (e.g. what is meant by 'synthetic a priori judgement' and why it is defined as such)
- illustrate the biographical aspects concerning a certain author and the social influences attributable to him.
NB: These questions are for illustrative purposes only and are therefore not binding. The examination will be carried out in the manner of an open conversion aimed at assessing not only the candidate's knowledge, but also his or her critical and expository capacity, language property, familiarity with technical jargon and ability to express functional and creative intellectual performance. In this regard, it should be noted that the lectures include moments of exchange between the lecturer and the participants that prepare them to intervene critically in the manner listed above.