Education and Philosophy in Ancient Greece
Academic Year 2025/2026 - Teacher: CHIARA MILITELLOExpected Learning Outcomes
After attending the class on Education and Philosophy in the Ancient World, the student will understand how philosophy was born, will know the fundamental aspects of ancient philosophical thought, with particular attention to the theme of education (paideia), will grasp the elements of continuity and rupture between contemporary and ancient thought, and will assimilate the differences between the different types of educational relationships and between the different intellectual and ethical models that can be found in Greek history. This will accustom the student to confronting an “other” that is distant in time, which will in turn be useful for understanding the people who come from a different culture. From a more specifically methodological point of view, the student will be equipped with the hermeneutical tools necessary to recognize the origin and initial development of the main philosophical questions, to understand the ancient philosophical texts and grasp the main theories exposed in them, to understand which are the roots of “Western” civilization, and to apply the methods of philosophy to education. In general, the student will have a clear picture of the theoretical and methodological tools used in the study of philosophy and ancient educational processes.
The student will also be able to personally evaluate the different current theories on ancient thought, and to apply the lessons of ancient philosophers to modern educational problems with a critical spirit. The student will master the ancient philosophical vocabulary, but, above all, he will be aware of the importance of using a precise technical vocabulary. Finally, the student will cultivate their learning skills, including the (particularly important but not always practiced) skill of understanding a written text that does not have the form of a treatise, and will be used to consulting experts in the crucial moments of their learning-by-oneself path.
The expected learning objectives, declined according to the Dublin Descriptors, are the following:
Knowledge and ability to understand (DD1):
- To know theories and models proper to ancient philosophy in order to interpret educational and training events.
Applied knowledge and understanding (DD2):
- Relate the theoretical and methodological contents learned to the interpretation of ancient philosophical-educational texts.
Autonomy of judgement (DD3):
- Evaluate the relevance of the ancient theories studied to modern educational problems.
Communication skills (DD4):
- To be able to communicate and share analysis of events from knowledge of the history of one’s professional field.
Learning skills (DD5):
- To be able to define one’s own personal development plan, monitoring one’s actions.
- To be able to promote self-assessment actions aimed at one’s own professional development.Course Structure
Required Prerequisites
Attendance of Lessons
Detailed Course Content
Textbook Information
1. Plato, Charmides, translated with an introduction, notes, and analysis by Christoper Moore and Christopher C. Raymond, Hackett 2019, only the translation. [ISBN: 978-1624667787]
2. Julia Annas, Self-Knowledge in Early Plato, in Platonic Investigations, edited by Dominic J. O’Meara, The Catholic University of America Press 1985, pp. 111-138. [ISBN: 978-0-8132-3090-0] [available on the website of the course on Studium]
3. Aristotle, De Anima, translated, with introduction and notes, by C.D.C. Reeve, Hackett 2017, pp. 1-198. [ISBN: 978-1-62466-619-3].
4. John Sellars, Aristotle. Understanding the World’s Greatest Philosopher, Pelican 2023. [ISBN: 978-0241615652]| Author | Title | Publisher | Year | ISBN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platone, Manara Valgimigli | Opere | Laterza | 1966-67 | 9788842023715 |
| Dominic J. O’Meara | Platonic Investigations | The Catholic University of America Press | 1985 | 978-0-8132-3090-0 |
| Aristotele, Renato Laurenti | Dell’anima | Il tripode | 1970 | 9788858136003 |
| John Sellars | Sette brevi lezioni su Aristotele | Einaudi | 2024 | 9788806255282 |
| Plato, Christoper Moore and Christopher C. Raymond | Charmides | Hackett | 2019 | 978-1624667787 |
| Aristotle, C.D.C. Reeve | De Anima | Hackett | 2017 | 978-1-62466-619-3 |
| John Sellars | Aristotle. Understanding the World’s Greatest Philosopher | Pelican | 2023 | 978-0241615652 |
Course Planning
| Subjects | Text References | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Contemplative Life | 4 (chapter 1) |
| 2 | Studying Nature | 4 (chapter 2) |
| 3 | A Rational Animal | 4 (chapter 3) |
| 4 | Social Animals | 4 (chapter 4) |
| 5 | The Benefits of Literature | 4 (chapter 5) |
| 6 | A Good Life | 4 (chapter 6) |
| 7 | A Life of Inquiry | 4 (chapter 7) |
| 8 | The Scope and Difficulty of the Inquiry into the Soul | 3 (I.1) |
| 9 | A Critical Examination and Refutation of Prior Doctrines on the Soul’s Nature and Motion | 3 (I.2-5) |
| 10 | Defining the Soul as the Form and First Actuality of a Living Body | 3 (II.1) |
| 11 | Outlining the Hierarchy of Psychic Powers: Nutritive, Perceptive, and Intellectual | 3 (II.2-3) |
| 12 | The Nutritive Soul and the Function of Reproduction | 3 (II.4) |
| 13 | Perception as the Reception of Sensible Form Without Matter | 3 (II.5-6) |
| 14 | A Systematic Analysis of the Five Senses: Sight, Hearing, Smell, Taste, and Touch | 3 (II.7-11) |
| 15 | The Unifying Faculty of “Common Sense” and the Awareness of Perception | 3 (II.12-III.2) |
| 16 | The Nature of Imagination (Phantasia) and Its Distinction from Perception and Belief | 3 (III.3) |
| 17 | The Nature of the Intellect (Nous), Its Relation to Imagination, and the Distinction Between its Active and Passive Powers | 3 (III.4-8) |
| 18 | Desire (Orexis) and Practical Reason as the Sources of Animal Motion | 3 (III.9-11) |
| 19 | A Summary on the Interrelation of the Soul’s Faculties | 3 (III.12-13) |
| 20 | Treating the Soul as the True Cure for the Body | 1 (153a-157c) |
| 21 | Refuting Three Definitions of Temperance | 1 (157c-162b) |
| 22 | Defining Temperance as Self-Knowledge | 1 (162b-165e) |
| 23 | The Possibility and Usefulness of a “Science of Science” | 1 (165e-169c) |
| 24 | The Inability of a “Science of Science” to Judge Specific Knowledge | 1 (169c-172c) |
| 25 | Distinguishing Temperance as a Useless “Science of Science” from the Truly Beneficial Science of Good and Evil | 1 (172c-176d) |
| 26 | Self-knowledge in Early Plato | 2 |
Learning Assessment
Learning Assessment Procedures
Midterm Exam
Midterm tests on the course content are scheduled for attending students, in the form of a multiple-choice questionnaire administered via Microsoft Teams.
Students must pass this test with a score of at least 18/30 to avoid having to take the official oral exam on that section of the program.
The purpose of the midterm tests is summative, and the assessment results in a grade that is averaged into the final grade.
Final exam.
Oral examination, assessed on the basis of the following elements: relevance of the answers to the questions asked (necessary to pass the exam); content quality, ability to connect the various parts of the course, proper philosophical language, overall expressive skills (all these elements contribute to the final evaluation, provided that the answers are relevant).Examples of frequently asked questions and / or exercises
What is the first definition of temperance given by Charmides?
What conclusion do the interlocutors in the Charmides reach?
Read this passage from Plato’s Charmides and explain its meaning, placing it in context within the work.
Why does Julia Annas, to understand the young Plato’s conception of self-consciousness, refer to dialogues that might not be authentic?
Why, according to Socrates in the Charmides, is the notion of ‘knowing that one knows’ problematic?
According to Aristotle, what are the fundamental questions to ask about the soul?
Why, according to Aristotle, can an animal’s body not be simple?
Read this passage from Aristotele’s On the Soul and explain its meaning, placing it in context within the work.
What is the purpose of life according to Aristotle?
Was Aristotle dogmatic?