PSYCHOLOGY OF THE FAMILY AND FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS
Academic Year 2026/2027 - Teacher: ELENA COMMODARIExpected Learning Outcomes
Teaching contribution to the goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Goal 4: Quality, equitable, and inclusive education. Target 4.7: Ensure that students acquire clinical and interpersonal skills to work with diverse individuals, developing listening skills, understanding, and respect for cultural and psychological diversity
Course Structure
Required Prerequisites
Attendance of Lessons
Detailed Course Content
Family structure
Family identity
Interactive and relational processes within the family
The family life cycle
The various phases of the family life cycle (e.g., couple formation, families with young children, adolescent children, young adult children, and elderly parents, families in transition)
Different types of families and new forms of family relationships
Family research and intervention with an emphasis on psychotherapeutic intervention
The pragmatics of human communication and pathological communication in the family context (e.g., paradoxical communication and double bind)
Textbook Information
The texts contain transcripts of therapeutic
interventions and interviews, which are easily recognizable because they are
enclosed entirely in quotation marks. These sections are useful and
indispensable reading for understanding the theoretical content.
1) FAMIGLIE E TERAPIA DELLA FAMIGLIA . Autore S. Minuchin, Astrolabio
2) PSICOLOGIA DELLA FAMIGLIA, LA PROSPETTIVA SISTEMICO RELAZIONALE. Autore: Paolo Gambini, Franco Angeli,
3) PRAGMATICA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE UMANA. STUDIO DEI MODELLI INTERATTIVI, DELLE PATOLOGIE E DEI PARADOSSI
Course Planning
| Subjects | Text References | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The curriculum follows the content described in the "Contents" section. All topics described in detail in the course content are covered in Textbooks 1 and 2. Textbook 3 addresses the issues of human communication from an intrafamilial and dysfunctional perspective | 1,2,3 |
Learning Assessment
Learning Assessment Procedures
Oral. The final assessment may benefit from the results of exercises, individual or group, planned by the instructor. Participation in these exercises is not mandatory and may be completed during and/or at the end of the course.
If teaching is taught in a blended or distance learning format, necessary changes may be made to the previously stated content in order to comply with the planned program and the syllabus.
Learning assessment may also be conducted electronically, should the conditions require
it.if circumstances require it.
To ensure equal opportunities and in compliance with applicable laws, interested students
may request a personal interview to plan any compensatory and/or dispensatory measures, based on their educational objectives and specific needs. They may also contact the CInAP (Center for Active and Participatory Integration — Services for Disabilities and/or DSA) contact teacher in their department (https://www.cinap.unict.it/content/referenti).
The evaluation criteria used for the exam are as follows:
Adequacy of expression regarding content and method
Broadness of thematic awareness and lexical accuracy
Ability to critically analyze topics
Ability to make interdisciplinary connections
Ability to rework knowledge
Ability to transfer knowledge to operational contexts
Based on these criteria, the grade will be expressed in thirtieths according to the following scheme:
• Fail:
Knowledge, awareness, understanding, and lexical accuracy in the presentation of topics: significant deficiencies and inaccuracies
Ability to analyze, synthesize, delve deeper, and rework: irrelevant, with inappropriate generalizations and inadequate connections and analyses
Ability to transfer knowledge to operational contexts and make interdisciplinary connections: inadequate, with inappropriate connections and transfers
• 18–20
Knowledge, awareness, understanding, and lexical accuracy in the presentation of topics: barely sufficient, with extremely basic knowledge and imperfections Clear
Analysis, synthesis, in-depth analysis, and re-elaboration skills: barely adequate
Ability to transfer knowledge to operational contexts and make interdisciplinary connections: barely adequate and at an extremely basic level
• 21–23
Knowledge, awareness, understanding, and vocabulary correctness in presenting topics: slightly more than adequate
Analysis, synthesis, in-depth analysis, and re-elaboration skills: slightly more than adequate
Ability to transfer knowledge to operational contexts and make interdisciplinary connections: slightly more than adequate
• 24–26
Knowledge, awareness, understanding, and vocabulary correctness in presenting topics: fair, with adequate vocabulary correctness
Analysis, synthesis, in-depth analysis, and re-elaboration skills: fair, with adequate vocabulary correctness
Fair analytical and synthesis skills, topics are presented coherently.
Ability to transfer knowledge to operational contexts and make interdisciplinary connections: Fair/good, interdisciplinary connections and transfer to appropriate fields of application.
• 27–29
Knowledge, awareness, understanding, and vocabulary accuracy in presenting topics: very good with minor imperfections.
Ability to analyze, synthesize, delve deeper, and revise: very good with high analytical skills. Ability to transfer knowledge to operational contexts and make interdisciplinary connections: very good, with interdisciplinary connections and transfer to fully appropriate and thorough application fields.
• 30–30 with honors
Knowledge, awareness, understanding, and vocabulary accuracy in presenting topics: excellent.
Ability to analyze, synthesize, delve deeper, and revise: excellent.
Ability to transfer knowledge to operational contexts and make interdisciplinary connections: excellent with a high level of depth in transferring knowledge to application fields and making interdisciplinary connections.