HISTORY OF CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHY

• Understanding and Knowledge (DD1)

  • To know the categories and models of inquiry used in the discipline, through knowledge of the most relevant issues dealt with in the field of modern philosophy. (core 1)

  Applied Understanding and Knowledge (DD2)

  • To connect the theoretical and methodological content learned to the periodization and temporal contextualization of philosophers. (core 1)

  • To be able to conduct research aimed at intervention through the use of technology. (core 2)

  • To be able to conduct research aimed at intervention through the use of national and international databases. (core 2)

  • To be able to manage self-assessment processes. (core 5)

  Independent Judgement (DD3)

  • To be able to synthesize the different approaches present in the thought of philosophers. (core 1)

  • To be able to organize and classify issues and philosophers, through a relevant use of philosophical vocabulary. (core 6)

  Communication Skills (DD4)

  • To be able to communicate and share the complexity and internal articulations of philosophical issues related to a specific period or philosopher. (core 1)

  Learning Skills (DD5)

  • To be able to identify the results of research and its possible developments on a methodological level and its impact on other disciplines. (core 2)

Lectures (methodological strategy used: Active learning), Group work, Exercises on philosophical texts.

Knowledge of philosophical issues and the most representative philosophers in the history of ancient and modern philosophy.

The following matters will be examined: Mind, Knowledge, Language, Science, Morality, Politics, Law, Metaphysics, the re-enactment of the History of Philosophy.

• Module A: The following thinkers will be dealt with through their biographical and philosophical development: Post-Hegelian Schools, Schopehauer, Marx, Husserl, Heidegger, Jaspers, Russell, Wittgenstein, The Vienna Circle, Popper.
• Module B:  Artificial Intelligence and Human Thought: Perspectives and Critical Issues from a Philosophical Point of View.
• Module C: Workshop on a reading of your choice.
  

1.G. Cambiano, M. Mori, Storia della filosofia contemporanea, Laterza, Bari 2014. 

2.J. Searle, Intelligenza artificiale e pensiero umano. Filosofia per un tempo nuovo, Castelvecchi, Roma 2024.

3.M. Galletti, S. Zipoli Caiani, Filosofia dell'intelligenza artificiale. Sfide etiche e teoriche, Il Mulino, Bologna 2024.

4.Storozhyk, M. (2024). Philosophy of future: analytical overview of interaction between education, science, and artificial intelligence in the context of contemporary challenges. Futurity Philosophy, 3(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2024.03.30.02

5.Youheng Zhang, A Historical Interaction between Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy. (2023). Teorie vědy Theory of Science, 45(2), 215-245. https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2023.579

It is envisaged during the course that the individual level of learning will be assessed through the administration of questionnaires. This self-assessment test may be taken into account for the formulation of the final grade, if accepted by the student and deemed by the lecturer to be congruent with the course objectives. The final grade will be formulated on the basis of the following indicators: Systematicity of treatment of the contents; Adequacy of expression with regard to the contents (possession of philosophical terminology); Ability to re-elaborate knowledge; Ability to organise knowledge in relation to specific objectives; Level of analytical skill demonstrated in relation to the topics covered by the examination programme; Ability to go into critical details

It is emphasised that at the time of the mid-term and final oral examinations, the questions are differentiated according to the cognitive input provided to the student and from which he is required to demonstrate: 1) content knowledge (first level), 2) ability to analyse (second level) and 3) aptitude for problematisation and critical comparison (third level). All questions relating to the historical contextualisation of the philosophers, the understanding of the correct meaning of the basic terms and concepts relating to their philosophies, as well as the correct attribution to the philosophers of their main works and the summary knowledge of the content referring to them are therefore considered essential for passing the examination. 

(Examples of questions: Apollonian and Dionysian in Nietzsche; Hegel: dates of publication and titles of the most relevant works; Comparison of the category of Being in Jaspers and Heidegger; Specific features of the genesis of Capital; Critical analysis of the different positions within the Vienna Circle).