HISTORY OF EPISTEMOLOGY FOR PSYCHOLOGY 2
Academic Year 2025/2026 - Teacher: CHIARA MILITELLOExpected Learning Outcomes
After following the course, the student will possess a solid knowledge of the main epistemological theories, something that is needed to understand the scientific status of the various psychological disciplines. The study of epistemology will also contribute, in a decisive way, to the acquisition of the critical spirit that is necessary both to begin a self-learning path and to explain the methodological assumptions of one’s field studies and of the research reported in the scientific literature.
The student will be familiar with the themes and vocabulary of philosophy, which will allow him to understand the philosophical debates that most interest psychologists. Vocabulary is particularly important, because the student will use a specialized vocabulary in this subject, just as in the other subjects he studies. The study of epistemology, or philosophy of science, will also guarantee the possession of the awareness of the complexity of the phenomena that are studied by biological and human sciences (to both of which psychology belongs in many ways) and of the problems that, consequently, are posed to those who try to “map” these phenomena. Finally, the study of the philosophy of science will provide the student with interdisciplinary skills.Course Structure
Required Prerequisites
Attendance of Lessons
Detailed Course Content
Textbook Information
1. Marco Castiglioni, Epistemologia e psicologia, EDUCatt 2001, 128 pp. [ISBN 9788883111280]
2. Kenneth J. Gergen, Social Construction and Moral Action, in Social Discourse and Moral Judgement, edited by Daniel N. Robinson, Academic Press 1992, pp. 9-27. [ISBN 0-12-590155-0]
3. Aristotle, Categories and De Interpretatione, edited by J.L. Ackrill, Clarendon Press 1963, pp. 1-42 and 71-112. [ISBN: 9780198720867]
4. Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Tavistock 1970, 387 pp. [ISBN: 0-679-75335-4]| Author | Title | Publisher | Year | ISBN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Castiglioni | Epistemologia e psicologia | EDUCatt | 2001 | 9788883111280 |
| Daniel N. Robinson | Social Discourse and Moral Judgement | Academic Press | 1992 | 0-12-590155-0 |
| Aristotele, Marcello Zanatta | Organon. I: Categorie. Dell’interpretazione. Analitici primi | UTET | 1996 | 88-02-04934-3 |
| Michel Foucault | Le parole e le cose. Un’archeologia delle scienze umane | Bur | 2016 | 9788817085571 |
| Aristotle, J.L. Ackrill | Categories and De Interpretatione | Clarendon Press | 1963 | 9780198720867 |
| Michel Foucault | The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences | Tavistock | 1970 | 0-679-75335-4 |
Course Planning
| Subjects | Text References | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The epistemological status of psychology | 1 (prima parte, capp. 1 e 6) |
| 2 | Theoretical and practical sciences | 1 (prima parte, cap. 2) |
| 3 | Epistemological models of the theoretical sciences | 1 (prima parte, cap. 3) |
| 4 | Epistemological models of the practical sciences | 1 (prima parte, cap. 4) |
| 5 | Epistemological models of psychology | 1 (prima parte, cap. 5) |
| 6 | Freud and psychoanalysis | 1 (seconda parte, cap. 1) |
| 7 | Behaviourism | 1 (seconda parte, cap. 2) |
| 8 | Constructivism and cognitivism | 1 (seconda parte, cap. 3) |
| 9 | Social constructionism | 1 (seconda parte, cap. 4) |
| 10 | Complexity epistemology | 1 (seconda parte, cap. 5) |
| 11 | Romanticism and inherent morality | 2 (§1) |
| 12 | The waning of romantic morality | 2 (§2) |
| 13 | Modernism and morality | 2 (§3) |
| 14 | Toward a constructionist theory of moral action | 2 (§4) |
| 15 | Moral discourse: necessary and desirable? | 2 (§5) |
| 16 | From the morass to the morality of relativism | 2 (§6) |
| 17 | Aristotle’s logic | 3 (notes) |
| 18 | Homonyms, synonyms, and paronyms | 3 (§1) |
| 19 | Being said of a subject and being in a subject | 3 (§2) |
| 20 | Predicative relations | 3 (§3) |
| 21 | Categories | 3 (§4) |
| 22 | Substance | 3 (§5) |
| 23 | Quantity | 3 (§6) |
| 24 | Relation | 3 (§7) |
| 25 | Quality | 3 (§8) |
| 26 | Action, suffering, and other categories | 3 (§9) |
| 27 | Opposites | 3 (§10) |
| 28 | Contraries | 3 (§11) |
| 29 | Priority and posteriorty | 3 (§12) |
| 30 | Posteriorty | 3 (§13) |
| 31 | The species of movement | 3 (§14) |
| 32 | Having | 3 (§15) |
| 33 | Las Meninas | 4 (c. 1) |
| 34 | The prose of the world | 4 (c. 2) |
| 35 | Representing | 4 (c. 3) |
| 36 | Speaking | 4 (c. 4) |
| 37 | Classifying | 4 (c. 5) |
| 38 | Exchanging | 4 (c. 6) |
| 39 | The Limits of Representation | 4 (c. 7) |
| 40 | Labour, Life, Language | 4 (c. 8) |
| 41 | Man and His Doubles | 4 (c. 9) |
| 42 | The Human Sciences | 4 (c. 10) |
Learning Assessment
Learning Assessment Procedures
Midterm Exam
Midterm tests on the course content are scheduled for attending students, in the form of a multiple-choice questionnaire administered via Microsoft Teams.
Students must pass this test with a score of at least 18/30 to avoid having to take the official oral exam on that section of the program.
The purpose of the midterm tests is summative, and the assessment results in a grade that is averaged into the final grade.
Final exam.
Oral examination, assessed on the basis of the following elements: relevance of the answers to the questions asked (necessary to pass the exam); content quality, ability to connect the various parts of the course, proper philosophical language, overall expressive skills (all these elements contribute to the final evaluation, provided that the answers are relevant).Examples of frequently asked questions and / or exercises
What is the difference between theoretical and practical sciences?
What are the assumptions of social constructionism?
What is practical-prescriptive inference?
In what sense has cognitivism been considered a missed revolution?
What does Gergen mean when he speaks of a Romantic conception of morality?
What does Gergen think about the relationship between principles and practice?
What does Aristotle mean by "substance" in the Categories?
What are the types of change according to Aristotle?
Read this passage from Aristotle’s Categories and explain its meaning, placing it in context within the work.
What was the conception of knowledge in the 16th century?
What are the three fundamental models of the human sciences according to Foucault?